HB 0116 |
Neutral | Aquifer Storage and Recovery - Prohibit for Floridan Aquifer in Certain Counties |
Atwood, Alex 179th |
---|
|
1/29/2015 |
House Second Readers |
NR&E |
- | - |
|
|
| Similar to SB 36, this legislation permanently prohibits aquifer storage and recovery in the Floridan Aquifer. It applies to the coastal counties of Brantley, Bryan, Camden, Charlton, Chatham, Effingham, Glynn, Liberty, Long, McIntosh, and Wayne. |
HB 0129 |
Neutral | Fluoridate Water - Counties Can Decide |
Stover, David 71st |
---|
|
1/29/2015 |
House Second Readers |
GAff |
- | - |
|
|
| This legislation allows counties, via the adoption of a resolution, the option of being included or excluded from the Department of Natural Resources' requirement to fluoridate potable water. Current law requires 10 percent of the voters in the last election to sign a petition, then approval through a referendum, to opt out of water fluoridation. The challenge will be with a water system serving multiple political jurisdictions, when some may opt out and others not. |
HB 0397 |
Neutral | Move Soil and Water Conservation Commission to Dept. of Agriculture |
Knight, David 130th |
---|
|
4/8/2015 |
House Date Signed by Governor |
A&CA |
AG&CA |
- |
|
|
| This legislation moves the State Soil and Water Conservation Commission under the Department of Agriculture for administration purposes. While the Governor still appoints members of said commission, members no longer have to be Conservation District Supervisors. |
HB 0518 |
Neutral | Satilla Regional Water and Sewer Authority; selection of members; revise manner |
Corbett, John 174th |
---|
|
5/12/2015 |
House Date Signed by Governor |
IGC |
SLGO |
- |
|
|
| |
HB 0582 |
Neutral | Coweta County Water and Sewerage Authority; members of authority; change terms |
Smith, Lynn 70th |
---|
|
5/12/2015 |
House Date Signed by Governor |
IGC |
SLGO |
- |
|
|
| |
HB 0623 |
Neutral | Macon Water Authority Act; ability to operate a storm water utility; provide |
Epps, Bubber 144th |
---|
|
5/12/2015 |
House Date Signed by Governor |
IGC |
SLGO |
- |
|
|
| |
HB 0627 |
Neutral | Lake Allatoona Preservation Authority; repeal Act |
Turner, Scot 21st |
---|
|
1/1/2016 |
Effective Date |
IGC |
SLGO |
- |
|
|
| |
HB 0735 |
Neutral | Stewart County Water and Sewerage Authority; membership appointments; revise |
Greene, Gerald 151st |
---|
|
6/1/2016 |
Effective Date |
IGC |
SLGO |
- |
|
|
| |
HB 0966 |
Evaluating | Stream Buffers - Change from Point of Wrested Vegetation to "Ordinary High Water Mark" |
Caldwell, Jr., Johnnie 131st |
---|
|
2/11/2016 |
House Second Readers |
NR&E |
- | - |
|
|
| This legislation changes the measurement of state-required stream buffers around state waters. Instead of measuring the 25-foot and 50-foot buffer on waters from the point "where vegetation is wrested by normal stream flow or wave action", the buffers will be measured outward from the "ordinary high water mark". |
HB 1022 |
Evaluating | Inert Landfills - Simplify the Permitting Process |
Kirby, Tom 114th |
---|
|
2/18/2016 |
House Second Readers |
NR&E |
- | - |
|
|
| In 2012, the state Environmental Protection Division (EPD) changed its rules on inert landfills, shifting from a permit by rule system to requiring a solid waste handling permit. Inert landfills could be grandfathered in if they were certified by a professional engineer as having met certain stringent requirements. This legislation removes the grandfather and engineer certification components and allows inert waste landfill operators to obtain a solid waste handling permit if the operator notifies the EPD Director and has met the following requirements: if the landfill only accepts waste that is not likely to produce leachate of environmental concern; if no portion of the waste disposal area is located within 100 feet of any property line or enclosed structure; if the waste is spread, compacted and covered at least monthly; if the landfill site is graded and drained to minimize runoff; if access to the landfill is limited; if suitable means are provided to prevent and control fires; and if a lift is properly covered within 30 days after the last placement of waste in the lift. |
HB 1025 |
Support | Service of Citation for Violations of Ordinance Violations |
Taylor, Tom 79th |
---|
|
7/1/2016 |
Effective Date |
Judy |
JUDY |
- |
|
|
| This legislation allows local legislation permitting county ordinance violations that deal with the condition of real property to be served by leaving a copy of the citation at the property, mailing a copy to the property owner shown in the records of the tax commissioner or tax assessor, and filing a copy with the magistrate court clerk. If the owner of the property fails to attend the trial, a fine against the property (i.e., "in rem") is the only penalty permitted. |
HB 1026 |
Evaluating | Property Owner Fines for Code Violations |
Carter, Doreen 92nd |
---|
|
2/18/2016 |
House Second Readers |
Judy |
- | - |
|
|
| This legislation allows a $100 fine per day to be levied against the owner of property (other than a property owner who has filed for homestead exemption) who fails to correct a code violation within 48 days of a notice to correct being sent. In the case of foreclosed properties, the code violation must be sent to the address contained on the postforeclosure registry maintained by the superior court clerk's office. The fine constitutes a lien that can be created and foreclosed in the same manner as a tax lien. This bill also requires the superior court clerk to establish and maintain a postforeclosure registry to maintain information about the purchases of real property at a foreclosure sale. Within ten business days after a property is purchased at a foreclosure sale, the buyer must provide the superior court clerk with his or her contact information. The new owner must notify the superior court clerk's office of any change in address within five business days of a change in contact information. Purchasers of foreclosed property that do not comply with this legislation or with ordinances related to the property may be required to pay treble damages plus attorneys' fees if they are sued and lose.
|
HB 1036 |
Neutral | Pipeline Companies - Moratorium on Eminent Domain |
Hitchens, Bill 161st |
---|
|
5/3/2016 |
House Date Signed by Governor |
EU&T |
RI&Util |
- |
|
|
| This legislation imposes a temporary moratorium on the eminent domain powers of pipeline companies and on the ability of pipeline companies to get certain environmental permits until June 30, 2017. HB 1036 also creates the State Commission on Petroleum Pipelines to study and develop a recommendation to the General Assembly of legislation to ensure that pipeline siting, construction and operation are consistent with the public interest in establishing minimum standards for land use to protect and preserve natural resources, environment, and vital areas and to best serve the residents of Georgia. |
HB 1114 |
Neutral | Brunswick-Glynn County Joint Water and Sewer Commission; provide immunity and exemption from liability |
Jones, Jeff 167th |
---|
|
3/31/2016 |
House Date Signed by Governor |
IGC |
SLGO |
- |
|
|
| |
HR 1198 |
Neutral | Aquifer Storage and Recovery - EPD to Review its Regulations |
Smith, Lynn 70th |
---|
|
2/11/2016 |
House Passed/Adopted By Substitute |
NR&E |
- | - |
|
|
| Substituting for SB 36 from the last legislative session, this resolution encourages the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) to "review" regulations and issue a report to the Board of Natural Resources on aquifer storage and recovery to make sure that they adequately protect and preserve the state's aquifers. SB 36 had required EPD to adopt additional regulations to protect the Floridan aquifer under aquifer storage and recovery projects. |
HR 1343 |
Support | EPA - Urge to Witdrawal Proposed "Waters of the U.S." Rule |
McCall, Tom 33rd |
---|
|
3/16/2016 |
House Passed/Adopted By Substitute |
NR&E |
- | - |
|
|
| This legislation encourages the United States Environmental Protection Agency to withdraw the proposed Waters of the United States Clean Water Plan rule. |
SB 0036 |
Neutral | Aquifer Storage and Recovery - DNR Must Promulgate Rules |
Ligon, Jr., William 3rd |
---|
|
3/19/2015 |
House Second Readers |
NR&E |
NR&E |
- |
|
|
| This legislation requires the Board of the Department of Natural Resources to promulgate rules to ensure that any future aquifer storage and recovery projects do not negatively impact the water quality of the aquifer. |
SB 0101 |
Support | Coastal Marshland Buffers |
Watson, Ben 1st |
---|
|
5/6/2015 |
Senate Date Signed by Governor |
NR&E |
NR&E |
- |
|
|
| This legislation, a compromise from an array of stakeholders, is aimed at resolving an ongoing dispute on establishing and measuring marshland buffers. It establishes a 25-foot buffer along coastal marshlands, as measured horizontally from the coastal marshland-upland interface. County transportation, utility, drainage and stormwater infrastructure are exempt so long as adequate erosion control measures are in place. The DNR Board is charged with promulgating rules pertaining to buffer variances. |
SB 0326 |
Negotiating | Soil Erosion and Sedimentation - Shorten Time for LIA to Act on Permits |
Jeffares, Rick 17th |
---|
|
2/4/2016 |
Senate Read and Referred |
- | RI&Util |
- |
|
|
| This legislation shortens the time period that counties (which are local issuing authorities) have to approve or deny a land disturbance permit from 45 days to 14 days. Furthermore, in addition to all other existing requirements, the bill mandates that only professional engineers (or a few other licensed professionals) may review land development plans (Level 2 Reviewers). If your county is a local issuing authority, please e-mail Todd Edwards (tedwards@accg.org) your concerns on complying with this legislative proposal. |
SB 0346 |
Support | Roads - Exempt Projects Less than $100 Million from the Environmental Policy Act |
Beach, Brandon 21st |
---|
|
7/1/2016 |
Effective Date |
Trans |
TRANS |
- |
|
|
| Under this bill, a state or local government road or airport project that does not exceed $100 million does not have to go through the stringent requirements of the Environmental Policy Act. However, an environmental evaluation will be considered in the decision-making process when it is probable to expect significant adverse impact on historical sites or buildings and cultural resources. |