Source: Travis Fain, WRAL, 9/28/17

House leaders gave a Senate push to outlaw expensive state regulations the side-eye Thursday, questioning whether legislation likely to be before the General Assembly next week is the right path to a noble goal.
Officials from the state's executive branch poked holes in the proposal as well, complaining of vague language and unintended consequences. For example: Would House Bill 162's prohibition on regulations that cost "all persons affected" $100 million or more over five years mean the state can't re-up immunization requirements for school children? 

For more of this story, click here.