|
Source: CORNERSTONE, 2/13/21
On Wednesday, February 10th, the House Agriculture Committee
held a meeting to consider the agricultural provisions of the budget
reconciliation measure, S. Con. Res. 5. The measure if part of the $1.9
trillion COVID relief package and outlines the $16.1 billion for USDA. The
lengthy markup concluded with a party-line vote to adopt the measure.
House Democrats expressed an urgency to pass the bill to secure access to
additional funding for food and nutrition programs in a particular effort to
address racial disparities. Ranking Member Thompson criticized the measure, as
well as the process in which it was developed, saying everything was done
without Republican input. Reps Thompson, Cammack, Feenstra, and Fischbach were
determined to secure the approval of amendments that would specialize the uses
of the funds being discussed. Rep. Austin Scott was outspoken in his effort to
warn the Democratic side that race selective aid would be challenged in court.
The committee ultimately ordered the bill, as amended, to be favorably reported
to the House by record vote.
Subtitles Considered
- Subtitle A - Agriculture
- Section 1001: Food Supply
Chain and Agriculture Pandemic Response
- Section 1002: Emergency Grants
for Rural Health Care
- Section 1003: Pandemic Program
Administration Funds
- Section 1004: Funding for the
USDA Office of Inspector General for Oversight of COVID-19 Related
Programs
- Section 1005: Farm Loan
Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers
- Section 1006: Assistance and
Support for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers, Ranchers, Forest Landowners
and Operators, and Groups
- Section 1007: Funding for Food
for Peace Title II Grants
- Subtitle B - Nutrition
- Section 1011: Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program
- Section 1012: Additional
Assistance for SNAP Online Purchasing and Technology Improvements
- Section 1013: Additional
Funding for Nutrition Assistance Programs
- Section 1014: Commodity
Supplemental Food Program
Members in Attendance Chairman David Scott (D-GA), Rep. Jim Costa (D-CA), Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA), Rep. Filemon Vela (D-TX), Rep. Alma Adams (D-NC), Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-CT), Rep. Antonio Delgado (D-NY), Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL), Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Rep. Gregorio Sablan (D-MP), Rep. Ann Kuster (D-NH), Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-IL), Rep. Sean Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI), Rep. Tom O’Halleran (D-AZ), Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), Rep. Al Lawson (D-FL), Rep. Lou Correa (D-CA), Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN), Rep. Josh Harder (D-CA), Rep. Cindy Axne (D-IA), Rep. Kim Schrier (D-WA), Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Ranking Member Glenn Thompson (R-PA), Rep. Austin Scott (R-GA), Rep. Rick Crawford (R-AR), Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-TN), Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-MO), Rep. LaMalfa (R-CA), Rep. Rodney Davis (R-IL), Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA), Rep. David Rouzer (R-NC), Rep. Trent Kelly (R-MS), Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE), Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD), Rep. Jim Baird (R-IN), Rep. Jim Hagedorn (R-MN), Rep. Chris Jacobs (R-NY), Rep. Troy Balderson (R-OH), Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX), Rep. Tracey Mann (R-KS), Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-IA), Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL), Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL), Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN)
Section 1001: Food Supply Chain and Agriculture Pandemic Response
Section Summary
Appropriates $4 billion to the Secretary to purchase and distribute food and
agriculture commodities, to make grants and loans for small or midsized food
processors and distributors, and for assistance to maintain and improve food
and agricultural supply chain resiliency.
Amendments Considered
Amendment Offered by Rep. Feenstra #6
Makes assistance available to producers who suffered disaster losses in 2020
including losses due to high wind events and forest fires. The amendment was an
effort to specify the use of funds from Section 1001.
Result: Rep. Thompson supported the amendment Rep. Sablan did not
support because he did not know how the money would be redirected. The
amendment was accepted with 24 yays to 23 nays after Rep. Axne changed her
vote.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Davis #10
Lends support to the biofuels industry by access biofuel producers access to
the $4 billion in funds geared toward varied relief under Subtitle A.
Result: The amendment was not supported by Rep. Bustos, who stated
that Senate Republicans and former Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue had
been blocking biofuel assistance. Rep. Craig added that she also opposed the
amendment and that Agriculture Secretary nominee Tom Vilsack already planned to
provide money for biofuels. Rep. Fischbach voiced her support for the
amendment, saying that it was important for the industry to not be damaged by
closures. The amendment was rejected by record vote across party lines with 25
yays and 23 nays.
Amendment Offered by Rep. LaMalfa #11
Redirects $200 million, of the $300 million to be used for monitoring and
surveillance of susceptible animals for incidence of SARS-CoV-2, towards
providing grants and loans for measures to protect workers from COVID-19.
Result: Withdrawn by Rep. LaMalfa.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Johnson #13
Includes research and vaccination to the activities to receive funding under
the animal health and COVID-19 animal surveillance section.
Result: Withdrawn by Rep. Johnson.
Section 1002: Emergency Grants for Rural Health Care
Section Summary
This section directs the Secretary to use $500 million to establish a pilot
grant program to increase capacity for vaccine distribution, provide drug or
medical supplies, reimburse for COID-19-related expenses and loss of revenue,
and increase telehealth capabilities.
Section 1003: Pandemic Program Administration Funds
Section Summary
This section provides $47.5 million for necessary pandemic program
administrative expenses at the Department of Agriculture.
Section 1004: Funding for the USDA Office of Inspector General for Oversight
of COVID-19 Related Programs
Section Summary This section provides $2.5 million for USDA’s office of the Inspector General to audit, investigate, and conduct other oversight activities of projects and activities carried out with funds made available to the Department of Agriculture related to the pandemic.
Section 1005: Farm Loan Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and
Ranchers
Section Summary
Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to provide payment equal to 120% of
outstanding indebtedness in the form of a direct loan made by the Secretary
and/or a farm loan guarantee made by the Secretary for each socially
disadvantaged farmer or rancher.
Amendments Considered
Amendment Offered by Rep. Feenstra #2
This amendment would reduce the percentage of outstanding indebtedness for
direct farm loans or fam loan guarantees the Department of Agriculture would
pay to each socially disadvantaged farmer from 120% to 100%.
Result: Rep. Adams opposed the amendment, saying that cancellation of debt is still taxed, and providing 120% would allow farmers to have money to pay that tax. Rep. Austin Scott argued extensively in favor of the amendment, stating that paying 120% of farm loan debt would set a dangerous precent that could one day be applied to housing. He asked counsel if it was explicitly the race or ethnicity that determined eligibility. When he was told yes, Rep. Austin Scott predicted that the amendment would be the target of a “reverse discrimination” lawsuit, which would expand the loan payoff to all farmers, regardless of race. The amendment was rejected by record vote across party lines.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Hartzler #5
This amendment would keep the bill focused on the pandemic by directing USDA to
only repay direct farm loans and farm loan guarantees to socially disadvantaged
famers that incurred indebtedness as a direct result of the pandemic.
Result: Rep. Cammack supported the amendment, saying that the bill
should be focused on addressing the pandemic and not on other issues that
should be focused on in other bills. Rep. Adams opposed the amendment and
stated that a comprehensive package was the best way to address the
discrimination people of color have faced in the agriculture industry. The
amendment was rejected by record vote across party lines.
Section 1006: Assistance and Support for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers,
Ranchers, Forest Landowners and Operators, and Groups
Section Summary
Provides $1.01 million for the Secretary to provide assistance for socially
disadvantaged ranchers, farmers and forest landowners and operators by providing
services such as technical assistance, cooperative development training,
development of legal centers focused on agricultural legal issues, and support
for research, education, and extension, as well as scholarships, at 1890 and
1994 land-grant university, and Native Hawaiian, Alaska Native, and
Hispanic-serving institutions.
Amendments Considered
Amendment Offered by Rep. Rodney Davis #15
Amends Sec. 1006(b)6 to expand eligibility to entities eligible to receive
funds under a capacity and infrastructure funds.
Result: Withdrawn by Rep. Davis.
Section 1007: Funding for Food for Peace Title II Grants
Section Summary
Provides an additional $800 million for Food for Peace Title 2 grants whose
funds remain available until September 30th, 2022.
Section 1011: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Section Summary
Extends the provision requiring the value of benefits provided through the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance program be calculated using 115% of the June
2020 value of the thrifty food plan to September 30th, 2021. This
section also includes funding for the Secretary and State agencies to
Administer the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Amendments Considered
Amendment Offered by Rep. Cammack #14
This amendment would strike the provision extending the value benefits
calculation and direct funding to be used for employment and training programs.
Result: Reps. Thompson and O’Halleran were united in their support for the amendment, saying that there had to be a way to reduce welfare dependency in the United States. Rep. Hagedorn also supported the bill and said more employment training had to be funded. Rep. Adams responded by stating that this was not the time for training. Rep McGovern was adamantly opposed to the amendment, which he found necessary to address food insecurity. The amendment was rejected by record vote across party lines.
Section 1012: Additional Assistance for SNAP Online Purchasing and
Technology Improvements
Section Summary
Provides $25 million to make technology improvements to online purchasing in
the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Section 1013: Additional Funding for Nutrition Assistance Programs
Section Summary
Appropriates an additional $1 billion to remain available until September 30th,
2027 for the Secretary to provide grants to Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and
the Northern Mariana Islands for nutrition assistance.
Section 1014: Commodity Supplemental Food Program
Section Summary
This section provides $37 million for the Commodities Supplemental Food
Program.
Other Amendments Considered
Amendment Offered by Rep. Feenstra #4
Requires any unobligated balance, without fiscal year limitation, as of
September 30, 2022, be returned to the Treasury.
Result: The amendment was rejected by record vote across party
lines.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Baird #8
Mandates that no money being allocated from this bill be spent until USDA
resume the processing payments for the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program
(CFAP).
Result: Rep. Axne did not support the amendment because she
disagreed with many of the rules the previous administration had left behind and
still in place in the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP). Reps. Bacon
and Fischbach voiced their support for the amendment. Rep. Hagedorn praised the
amendment as containing the right incentives for the Biden administration to reauthorize
CFAP. The amendment was rejected by record vote across party lines.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Thompson #12
Reduces spending of each section by 23%, except for Secs. 1005 and 1006 and the
15% increase in SNAP in Sec. 1011(a) and redirects the money towards The
Renewable Fuel Reimbursement Program, Distance Learning and Telemedicine
Program, broadband, assistance for rural residence for utility bills, rural
hospital and essential facility operators, and relief for borrowers under the
Rural Business Service programs.
Result: Reps. Cammack, Austin Scott, and Kelly expressed support
for the amendment, citing the continued investment it made in expanding rural
broadband. Rep. Adams opposed the amendment on grounds that it stripped aid
from black farmers and would not increase the SNAP benefit. The amendment was
rejected with 24 nays to 23 yays, with all members voting along party lines.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Hagedorn #9
This amendment would delay the spending of the monies under this bill until 80%
of funds from previous expenditures that have been approved by Congress are
complete. The amendment would apply on a program-by-program basis.
Result: Reps. McGovern, Hayes, and Pingree opposed the amendment
over concerns that urgent aid could be delayed or withheld when needed. Reps.
Cammack, Thompson, and Baird all supported the amendment, believing that money
still unspent should be used up first. Rep. Hartzler added that supporting the
amendment means distributing the aid but in a fiscally responsible manner. The
amendment was rejected by record vote across party lines.
Amendment Offered by Rep. Bacon #7
Appropriates $300 million to support university research programs that were
disrupted by COVID-19. The amendment also provides $80 million to carry out
cooperative extension and education programs impacted by COVID-19.
Result: The amendment was rejected by record vote across party
lines.
THE CORNERSTONE TEAM
For more information, go to https://cgagroup.com/
|