Meat group’s COOL argument gets another hearing
Story Date: 4/7/2014

 

Source: Lisa M. Keefe, MEATINGPLACE, 4/4/14


The meat groups’ request for a stay in the enforcement of country-of-origin labeling laws will get another hearing before a panel of judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, according to court papers filed today.
The North American Meat Association, American Meat Institute and several other groups filed a lawsuit last summer, arguing that mandatory COOL regulations, as written, are unconstitutional. They also asked that the law not be enforced while their case made its way through the court system.


Last week, the D.C. appellate court ruled against the request for a stay, however, the opinion noted that existing case law pointed in conflicting directions and recommended an en banc hearing by a panel of the court’s judges.
The most recent court order established such a hearing, scheduled for May 19. The specific issue that the panel is to consider is whether the COOL regulations constitute a form of compelled speech that is allowable under the First Amendment.


“We had strong concerns with the reasoning in the March 28 ruling,” said AMI’s general counsel, Mark Dopp, in an emailed statement. “Today’s court order to vacate the ruling signals that some members of the court may share those concerns. We remain hopeful that consideration of the case by the full Court will lead to an injunction ….”

For more stories, go to www.meatingplace.com.

 
 
























   Copyright © 2007 North Carolina Agribusiness Council, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
   All use of this Website is subject to our
Terms of Use Agreement and our Privacy Policy.